{"text_format":"3","workbook":"xls","n_sheets":4,"sheets":["评审总结报告","评审问题列表","评审检查单检查记录","使用说明"],"not_rendered":{"external_links":1,"defined_names":2,"comments":2},"read":"whole","date_system":"1900","formulas":"cached_only"}

{"sheet":"评审总结报告","index":0,"n_rows":63,"n_cols":5,"rows_kept":63,"merged":[[0,0,0,4],[1,1,1,2],[2,1,2,2],[3,1,3,2],[4,3,4,4],[5,0,16,0],[5,3,5,4],[6,3,6,4],[17,1,17,2],[36,1,36,2],[40,0,40,4],[41,1,41,2],[42,1,42,2],[57,0,57,1],[58,0,58,1],[59,0,59,1],[60,0,60,1],[61,0,61,1],[62,0,62,1]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["评审总结报告"]
["项目名称","南京长江隧道管养信息化项目",null,"项目编号"]
["项目经理","高才驰",null,"评审方式","项目正式评审"]
["评审发起人","高才驰",null,"评审编号"]
[null,"编号","标识","简述"]
["评审内容",1,"概要设计"]
[null,2]
[null,3]
[null,4]
[null,5]
[null,6]
[null,7]
[null,8]
[null,9]
[null,10]
[null,11]
[null,12]
["评审日期","2014-04-28",null,"评审地点","客户公司218会议室"]
[]
["评审组角色","编号","签名","准备工作量\n（小时）","会议工作量\n（小时）"]
["主席",null,"高才驰",2,3]
["作者",null,"高才驰"]
[null,null,"马英虎",2,3]
["记录员",null,"孙强",2,3]
["跟踪人",null,"孙强"]
["评审人",null,"陈飞",2,3]
[null,null,"孙晶晶",0.5,3]
[null,null,"戴鹏飞",2,3]
[null,null,"王晓勇",2,3]
[null,null,"潘虎",1,3]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["评审结论","通过",null,"评审评价","小改动"]
["备注："]
[]
[]
["评审数据分析"]
["准备总工作量\n（小时）",13.5,null,"会议时间长度\n（小时）",12]
["问题跟踪\n工作量\n（小时）",2.5,null,"评审总工作量\n（小时）",40]
[]
["角色",null,"评审结论","补充材料"]
["主席",null,"不做修改","问题列表"]
["作者",null,"小改动","相关列表"]
["记录员",null,"重大修改","其他"]
["跟踪人",null,"重做"]
["评审人",null,"评审未完成"]
["评审缺陷个数分类统计："]
["细微",2]
["一般",7]
["严重",1]
["致命",0]
[]
["评审效率"]
["评审会议总工作量\n（人时）",null,24]
["发现的缺陷总数",null,10]
["效率\n(缺陷个数/总工作量）",null,{"v":0.4166666666666667,"d":"0.42"}]
["参考效率\n（组织提供参考值，存放于组织度量库）",null,0.5]
["偏差\n（实际效率-参考效率）",null,{"v":-0.08333333333333331,"d":"-0.08"}]
["分析：",null,"评审效率与参考效率相差不大，基本达到评审效率要求。各参与人员会议前准备比较充分，因此评审效率比较高。"]

{"sheet":"评审问题列表","index":1,"n_rows":19,"n_cols":10,"rows_kept":19,"merged":[[0,0,0,8]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["评审问题列表"]
["ID","问题描述","提出人","解决建议","解决方式","严重\n程度","预计解决时间","修改人","跟踪人","跟踪意见、签字"]
[1,"报表导出依赖模块缺少权限","陈继伟","增加权限依赖模块说明","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[2,"模块关联关系缺少报表导出对角色管理的依赖","王晓勇","增加依赖关系","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[3,"外部接口缺少详细描述","王晓勇","增加与档案系统接口的详细描述","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[4,"系统架构描述太笼统","高才驰","增加结构图","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[5,"子系统描述与需求规格说明书不一致","孙晶晶","保持与需求规格说明书的一致","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[6,"事故管理中遗漏了重特大交通事故的设计","高才驰","补充智能手机APP处理巡检任务的设计。","修改","严重","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[7,"目录字体不一致","马英虎","保持风格一致","修改","细微","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[8,"“编写目的”下的内容太宽泛","马英虎","编写目的”阐明编写概要设计说明书的目的，指明读者对象即可；上级标题写“引言”，“引言”下包括“编写目的”、“项目背景”、“定义”和“参考资料”等； “设计概述”、“设计约束”、“设计策略”、“建设路线”、“设计约定”、“概述”可放在“任务概述”下，“任务概述”与“引言”平级。","修改","细微","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[9,"运行环境配置说明笼统","李红卫","运行环境应指明硬件环境（CPU、内存、硬盘）、软件环境（操作系统、数据库、浏览器、其他）。","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[10,"页性能设计缺少并发用户访问系统时，系统的性能指标","高才驰","增加服务器程序性能指标","修改","一般","2014-05-04","马英虎","孙强","已修改"]
[]
[]
[]
[]
[]
["裁剪指南："]
[null,"也可以使用《产品问题管理表》模板管理评审发现的缺陷。"]

{"sheet":"评审检查单检查记录","index":2,"n_rows":37,"n_cols":6,"rows_kept":37,"merged":[[1,1,1,2],[2,3,2,4],[4,1,4,4],[5,1,5,4],[6,1,6,4],[7,1,7,4],[8,1,8,4],[9,1,9,4],[10,1,10,4],[11,1,11,4],[12,1,12,4],[13,1,13,4],[14,1,14,4],[15,1,15,4],[16,1,16,4],[17,1,17,4],[18,1,18,4],[19,1,19,4],[20,1,20,4],[21,1,21,4],[22,1,22,4],[23,1,23,4],[24,1,24,4],[25,1,25,4],[26,1,26,4],[27,1,27,4],[28,1,28,4],[29,1,29,4],[30,1,30,4],[31,1,31,4],[32,1,32,4],[33,1,33,4],[34,1,34,4],[35,1,35,4],[36,1,36,4]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["文档版本",{"v":1,"d":"1.00"},"统    计","通过","未通过","不适用"]
["结   论","未通过",null,23,4,5]
[{"$nulls":3},"检查条目",null,32]
[]
["编号","检查项",{"$nulls":3},"检查结果"]
[1,"是否清晰地描述了数据流程、控制流程和接口？",{"$nulls":3},"未通过"]
[2,"文档结构是否清晰、组织是否合理？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[3,"文档结构是否便于维护和修改？","文档结构是否便于维护和修改？","文档结构是否便于维护和修改？","文档结构是否便于维护和修改？","通过"]
[4,"设计是否易于理解？","设计是否易于理解？","设计是否易于理解？","设计是否易于理解？","通过"]
[5,"各模块之间的关系是否描述的清楚？","各模块之间的关系是否描述的清楚？","各模块之间的关系是否描述的清楚？","各模块之间的关系是否描述的清楚？","通过"]
[6,"是否定义了目标？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[7,"是否记录了与本设计文档相关的假设、约束、决议、依赖？",{"$nulls":3},"不适用"]
[8,"设计在进度、预算和技术上是否可行？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[9,"逻辑上是否正确、完整？",{"$nulls":3},"未通过"]
[10,"是否对子模块的抽象算法进行了说明？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[11,"所选的设计或算法是否满足模块的需求？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[12,"是否有一些必要的数据结构没有定义？或定义了一些不必要的数据结构？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[13,"是否对数据元素进行了充分的描述？说明了有效的数据范围？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[14,"是否对共享和存储数据的管理和使用进行了明确的描述？",{"$nulls":3},"不适用"]
[15,"此设计是否能为开发提供充分的基础？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[16,"是否对性能参数进行了说明（如，实施约束、内存大小、速度要求等）",{"$nulls":3},"未通过"]
[17,"是否识别并分析了关键执行路径？",{"$nulls":3},"通过"]
[18,"是否对接口的功能特征进行了描述？","是否对接口的功能特征进行了描述？","是否对接口的功能特征进行了描述？","是否对接口的功能特征进行了描述？","通过"]
[19,"接口是否便于问题的解决？","接口是否便于问题的解决？","接口是否便于问题的解决？","接口是否便于问题的解决？","通过"]
[20,"是否所有的接口间相互一致，并和其他模块及需求相一致？","是否所有的接口间相互一致，并和其他模块及需求相一致？","是否所有的接口间相互一致，并和其他模块及需求相一致？","是否所有的接口间相互一致，并和其他模块及需求相一致？","未通过"]
[21,"是否所有接口都提供了要求的类型、数量和质量信息？","是否所有接口都提供了要求的类型、数量和质量信息？","是否所有接口都提供了要求的类型、数量和质量信息？","是否所有接口都提供了要求的类型、数量和质量信息？","通过"]
[22,"是否对接口的数量和复杂度进行了权衡，使接口的数量少并且复杂程度可以接受？","是否对接口的数量和复杂度进行了权衡，使接口的数量少并且复杂程度可以接受？","是否对接口的数量和复杂度进行了权衡，使接口的数量少并且复杂程度可以接受？","是否对接口的数量和复杂度进行了权衡，使接口的数量少并且复杂程度可以接受？","通过"]
[23,"操作接口的设计是否考虑了用户？","操作接口的设计是否考虑了用户？","操作接口的设计是否考虑了用户？","操作接口的设计是否考虑了用户？","不适用"]
[24,"在整个设计中，是否对数据元素、程序、功能的命名保持一致？","在整个设计中，是否对数据元素、程序、功能的命名保持一致？","在整个设计中，是否对数据元素、程序、功能的命名保持一致？","在整个设计中，是否对数据元素、程序、功能的命名保持一致？","通过"]
[25,"设计是否反应了真实的运行环境，包括软件和硬件？","设计是否反应了真实的运行环境，包括软件和硬件？","设计是否反应了真实的运行环境，包括软件和硬件？","设计是否反应了真实的运行环境，包括软件和硬件？","不适用"]
[26,"对模块的说明是否与软件需求文档中的功能要求相一致？","对模块的说明是否与软件需求文档中的功能要求相一致？","对模块的说明是否与软件需求文档中的功能要求相一致？","对模块的说明是否与软件需求文档中的功能要求相一致？","通过"]
[27,"是否所有的设计元素都可追踪回需求？","是否所有的设计元素都可追踪回需求？","是否所有的设计元素都可追踪回需求？","是否所有的设计元素都可追踪回需求？","通过"]
[28,"设计是模块化的吗？","设计是模块化的吗？","设计是模块化的吗？","设计是模块化的吗？","通过"]
[29,"模块具有高内聚度第偶合度吗？","模块具有高内聚度第偶合度吗？","模块具有高内聚度第偶合度吗？","模块具有高内聚度第偶合度吗？","通过"]
[30,"设计中是否提供了对错误的检测和恢复？","设计中是否提供了对错误的检测和恢复？","设计中是否提供了对错误的检测和恢复？","设计中是否提供了对错误的检测和恢复？","不适用"]
[31,"是否考虑了异常情况？","是否考虑了异常情况？","是否考虑了异常情况？","是否考虑了异常情况？","通过"]
[32,"设计是否满足系统完整性要求？","设计是否满足系统完整性要求？","设计是否满足系统完整性要求？","设计是否满足系统完整性要求？","通过"]

{"sheet":"使用说明","index":3,"n_rows":2,"n_cols":1,"rows_kept":2,"merged":[[0,0,0,7],[1,0,21,7]],"flags":["formulas_cached_only"]}
["使用说明"]
["1、评审准备总工作量由主持人统计各评审人评审产品并填写《评审准备表》的工作量。单位：人时。\n2、评审会议总工作量指会签评审方式中所有评审人评审的时间之和\n3、评审总工作量＝评审准备总工作量＋评审会议总工作量。注意统计整理评审报告所花费的工作量。\n4、“评审记录”页的解决方式有：修改、不是问题、暂不解决\n5、“评审记录”页的严重程度有：致命、严重、一般和细微。由评审人界定。\n6、评审不通过的界定：\n     a) 1个以上“致命”严重程度的问题就不通过。\n     b) 5个以上“严重”严重程度的问题就不通过。\n7、评审说明页的评审内容栏要和评审准备表中的内容保持一致。\n8、评审过程发现的新问题,由记录员在评审记录中登记,问题编号和评审准备表中的一致."]